Technology for preparing and holding a round table. Organization and holding of round tables. Working with information

When organizing a round table event, you need to take into account a large number of nuances. After all, communication at such a table presupposes maximum openness of the participants to each other and their readiness for dialogue. Therefore, for an effective round table, it is imperative that you first take care of choosing the right room. It should be spacious and bright enough so that each participant in the event can feel comfortable enough.

You also need to think about what the hall will be like. Flowers are often placed in the middle. In some cases, the center of the table is given over to demonstration screens that will duplicate the text of the speech.

Don't forget about the details. Prepare signs with the names of event participants in advance. Immediately determine who will sit and where. Decide this taking into account the views and interests of those present. So, for example, you should not place people next to each other who have diametrically opposed views on the same event - you will end up with nothing but conflict.

Place glasses of water on the table according to the number of participants in the event. Also include clean sheets of paper and writing utensils.

For the convenience of the speakers, prepare a projector, DVD player and (or a laptop) that will be connected to the screen. All this is necessary so that you can demonstrate visual materials during the performance.

Select the person who will lead the event. His tasks include process. This presenter must clearly react to the situation, master the topic of the event, be able to insert the right question at the right time or move the conversation into a more peaceful direction in case of a clash between rivals who are irreconcilable on a particular issue.

You also need to prepare a number of questions on the topic of the event. Suddenly the conversation gets stuck somewhere and you need to help those gathered. To do this, it is necessary to familiarize yourself with the topic of the conversation in advance and work out the smallest details related to it.

Of course, take into account the fact that the round table meeting must be interrupted at least once for a coffee break. You should also prepare for it in advance. Such a break does not imply a hearty lunch, so you need to organize canapés, caviar tartlets, cookies, sandwiches, as well as tea and coffee. The more soulfully you organize the “snack” break, the easier it will be for you to make some kind of general decision during the entire meeting.

Well, don’t forget about closing the event. The ending of the meeting must be thought through very carefully. This can be an award for all participants, or for just one person. The final word of the round table organizer may be used as a conclusion.

Round tables- This is one of the most popular formats for conducting scientific events. In essence, the Round Table is a platform for discussion of a limited number of people (usually no more than 25 people; by default, experts, respected specialists in a particular field).

But you should not use the concept of “round table” as a synonym for the concepts of “discussion”, “polemic”, “dialogue”. It is not right. Each of them has its own content, and it only partially coincides with the content of the others. A “round table” is a form of organizing an exchange of opinions. This term does not indicate what the nature of the exchange of opinions will be. In contrast, the concept of “discussion” assumes that during, for example, a “round table” its participants not only make reports on some issue, but also exchange remarks, clarify each other’s positions, etc. Within the framework of the discussion, free exchange of opinions (open discussion of professional problems). “Policy” is a special type of discussion, during which some participants try to refute and “destroy” their opponents. “Dialogue,” in turn, is a type of speech characterized by situationality (depending on the situation of the conversation), contextuality (depending on previous statements), a low degree of organization, involuntary and unplanned nature.

The peculiarity of round tables is their unpredictability, not real, since it is obvious that any organizer will want to control what is happening as much as possible, but theoretical. It is this point that makes Round Tables an attractive format for the audience. It should be noted that any discussion events (for example, debates) are at the same time a relatively risky decision and, at the same time, provide the organizer with a significant advantage - the opportunity to show their creativity.

The purpose of the round table is to reveal a wide range of opinions on the issue chosen for discussion from different points of view, discuss unclear and controversial issues related to this issue, and reach consensus.

The task of the round table is to mobilize and activate participants to solve specific current problems, therefore the round table has specific features:

1. Personalization of information (participants during a discussion express not a general, but a personal point of view. It may arise spontaneously and not be fully formulated. Such information must be treated especially thoughtfully, choosing grains of what is valuable and realistic, comparing them with the opinions of other participants (discussants)).

2. The polyphony of the “round table” (during the “round table” there can be business noise, polyphony, which corresponds to the atmosphere of emotional interest and intellectual creativity. But this is precisely what makes the work of the presenter (moderator) and participants difficult. Among this polyphony, the presenter needs to “catch on “The main thing is to give everyone the opportunity to speak and continue to support this background, since it is precisely this that is the feature of the “round table”).

Organizational features of round tables:

relative cheapness of holding compared to other “open” event formats;

lack of a rigid structure and regulations. That is, the organizer has practically no tools for direct influence on the program (you cannot force guests to say what the organizers want), but only indirect ones. For example, you can divide the entire discussion into several semantic blocks, thereby formalizing the structure of the event, but everything that happens within these blocks depends entirely on the host of the Round Table; significant restrictions in terms of the number of visitors; intimate event.

Moderation (conducting).

A key element of any Round Table is moderation. The term "moderation" comes from the Italian "moderare" and means "mitigation", "restraint", "moderation", "restraint". The moderator is the leader of the discussion. In the Vatican, the moderator was the person who pointed out the most significant points in the speeches of the pope. In its modern meaning, moderation is understood as a technique for organizing communication, thanks to which group work becomes more focused and structured.

It is not an exaggeration to say that almost everything depends on the host (moderator) of the Round Table. His task is not just to announce the list of participants, outline the main topics of the event and launch the Round Table, but to hold in his hands everything that happens from beginning to end. Therefore, the requirements for the professional qualities of Round Table leaders are high.

The presenter must be able to clearly formulate the problem, not let the thought spread out, highlight the main idea of the previous speaker and, with a smooth logical transition, give the floor to the next one, follow the rules. Ideally, the Round Table leader should be impartial.

Do not forget that the moderator is also an actual participant in the Round Table. Therefore, he must not only direct the discussion, but also partially take part in it, focus the attention of those present on the information that is required, or, conversely, try to move the conversation in a new direction as quickly as possible. It should be remembered that the presenter must have the minimum required knowledge on the stated topic.

The presenter of the Round Table should not be:

Confused and intimidated. Such qualities are typical for novice presenters and are associated with anxiety and lack of practice.

Authoritarian. The desire to control and regulate the course of discussion to the maximum extent, to maintain strict discipline, is not conducive to discussion. Conniving. The facilitator must focus the discussion on the issues being discussed and concentrate it in time. Connivance on his part will contribute to the activation of alternative leaders who will try to shift attention to themselves. The discussion will begin to move away from the topic and break up into local discussions. Too active. The task of extracting information requires limiting the activity of the leader.

Poor listeners. The facilitator's lack of listening skills will result in a lot of useful information being lost from what was said during the discussion. In this case, the more subtle comments received as a result of public discussion, which represent the basis for deepening the discussion, will remain unheeded. The reasons for this behavior may be the desire of the Round Table leader to strictly follow the discussion questionnaire, as a result of which he concentrates his attention on it. Or a concern about effectively listening to everyone in the group without leaving anyone out and giving everyone equal time.

Comedian. Involves focusing on the entertainment aspect of the discussion more than on its content.

Exhibitionist. Such a leader uses the group mainly for self-affirmation purposes and puts personal goals above research goals. Narcissism can be expressed in pretentious poses, unnatural gestures and intonations, moralizing and other forms of “working for the public.”

Rules for round table participants:

the participant must be an expert on the topic being discussed;

You should not agree to participate in the Round Table just for the sake of the very fact of participation: if you have nothing to say, then it is better to remain silent.

Stages of preparing round tables:

Selecting a topic. It is carried out with a focus on the areas of scientific work of the department and teachers. Departments propose topics for “Round Tables” with justification for the need for its discussion and development. In this case, the general rule should be taken into account: the more specifically the topic is formulated, the better. In addition, the topic should be of interest to the audience.

Selection of presenter (moderator) and his preparation. The moderator must have such qualities as communication skills, artistry, and intelligence. Personal charm and a sense of tact are also important. The competence of the presenter plays a special role for the Round Table, therefore the moderator is obliged to independently carry out preparations within the framework of the given topic of the Round Table.

Selection of participants and identification of Round Table experts. The essence of any Round Table is to attempt a brainstorming session on a specific issue and find answers to some important questions. To do this, it is necessary to gather in one place people who have the necessary knowledge on the issue that requires coverage. These people are called experts or specialists. The initiator needs to identify potential experts who could give qualified answers to questions that arise as part of the discussion of the stated topic of the Round Table. If the scale of the event extends beyond the boundaries of the university, it is advisable at the preliminary stage of preparation of the Round Table to send out information letters and invitations to participate in this event to the intended participants. It should be remembered that the formation of a group of participants requires a differentiated approach: these should be not only competent, creatively thinking people, but also officials, representatives of the executive branch, on whom decision-making depends.

Preparing a questionnaire for the Round Table participants - the purpose of the questionnaire is to quickly and without a lot of time and money to get an objective idea of the opinion of the Round Table participants on the issues discussed. The survey can be continuous (in which all participants of the Round Table are surveyed) or selective (in which part of the Round Table participants are surveyed). When compiling a questionnaire, it is necessary to determine the main task-problem, break it down into components, and assume on the basis of what information it will be possible to draw certain conclusions. Questions can be open, closed, semi-closed. Their wording should be short, clear in meaning, simple, precise, and unambiguous. You need to start with relatively simple questions, then offer more complex ones. It is advisable to group questions according to meaning. Before the questions, there is usually a message to the survey participants and instructions for filling out the questionnaire. At the end, the participants should be thanked.

Preparation of a preliminary resolution of the Round Table. The draft final document should include a statement part, which lists the problems that were discussed by the participants of the Round Table. The resolution may contain specific recommendations to libraries, methodological centers, government bodies at various levels, developed during discussion or decisions that can be implemented through certain activities, indicating the deadlines for their implementation and those responsible.

Round table structure

The round table includes:

1. willingness of participants to discuss the problem in order to determine possible ways to solve it.

2. presence of a certain position, theoretical knowledge and practical experience.

It is possible to organize such a round table when the discussion is deliberately based on several points of view on the same issue, the discussion of which leads to positions and solutions acceptable to all participants.

Thus, the integral components of the round table:

1. unresolved issue;

2. equal participation of representatives of all interested parties;

3. development of solutions acceptable to all participants on the issue under discussion.

When holding a round table, in order to achieve a positive result and create a business atmosphere, it is necessary:

· Provide an optimal number of participants (if the circle of specialists is large, not one leader is needed, but two.

· Ensure the operation of technical means for audio and video recording.

· Establish a schedule for speeches.

· Ensure appropriate design of the audience (it is desirable that the “round table” is truly round and communications are carried out “face to face”, which promotes group communication and maximum involvement in the discussion.)

Methodology for organizing and conducting a round table

There are usually three stages in organizing and holding a round table: preparatory, discussion and final (post-discussion).

I Preparatory stage includes:

· choice of problem (the problem must be acute, relevant, and have various solutions). The problem chosen for discussion may be interdisciplinary in nature; it should be of practical interest to the audience from the point of view of developing professional competencies;

· selection of a moderator (the moderator leads the round table, so he must have a high level of mastery of the art of creating a trusting atmosphere and maintaining a discussion, as well as the method of increasing information);

· selection of discussants. The composition of the round table participants can be expanded by involving representatives of executive authorities, professional communities and other organizational structures;

· preparing a scenario (holding a round table according to a pre-planned scenario allows you to avoid spontaneity and chaos in the work of the round table).

The scenario assumes:

Definition of the conceptual apparatus (thesaurus);

List of discussion questions (up to 15 formulations);

Development of “homemade” answers, sometimes contradictory and extraordinary, using a representative sample of information;

Closing speech by the moderator;

· equipping the premises with standard equipment (audio-video equipment), as well as multimedia tools in order to maintain a business and creative atmosphere;

· counseling participants (allows most participants to develop certain beliefs that they will defend in the future);

· preparation of necessary materials (on paper or electronic media): this can be statistical data, materials of a rapid survey, analysis of available information in order to provide participants and listeners of the “round table”

II Discussion stage comprises:

1. speech by the moderator, which defines the problems and conceptual apparatus (thesaurus), establishes regulations, rules for the general technology of the lesson in the form of a “round table” and informs about the general rules of communication.

2. General rules of communication include recommendations:

· - avoid common phrases;

· - focus on the goal (task);

· - know how to listen;

· - be active in the conversation;

· - be brief;

· - provide constructive criticism;

· - do not make offensive remarks towards your interlocutor.

· The presenter must act in a directive manner, strictly limiting the time of the round table participants.

3. conducting an “information attack”: participants speak out in a certain order, using convincing facts that illustrate the current state of the problem.

4. speeches by discussants and identification of existing opinions on the questions raised, focusing on original ideas. In order to maintain the intensity of the discussion, it is recommended to formulate additional questions:

5. answers to discussion questions;

6. the moderator sums up mini-summaries of the speeches and discussions: formulating the main conclusions about the causes and nature of disagreements on the problem under study, ways to overcome them, and a system of measures to solve this problem.

III The final (post-discussion) stage includes:

· summing up the final results by the presenter;

· establishing the overall results of the event.

Related information.

Methodology

Preparation and holding of the round table

The competency-based approach puts in the first place not the specialist’s awareness and theoretical knowledge, but his ability to see the essence of the problem and find ways to solve it based on the practical application of existing knowledge. As one of the organizational active forms of interaction that allows deepening and strengthening the objective position of the teacher, the round table has great opportunities for discussing pressing, complex and current issues in the professional sphere, exchanging experiences and creative initiatives. The idea of “round tables” is a meeting of like-minded people seeking to find a common solution on a specific issue in the format of a given topic, as well as an opportunity for everyone to engage in discussion or debate on issues of interest. Discussion of the problem, exchange of opinions, valuable experience, establishing close contacts, searching for additional opportunities and discussion when discussing special, “hot” issues gives the “round table” dynamism and eccentricity.

Target“round table” - to reveal a wide range of opinions on the problem chosen for discussion from different points of view, to discuss unclear and controversial issues related to this problem, and to reach consensus.

The task The “round table” is to mobilize and activate participants to solve specific current problems, therefore the “round table” has specific features:

The round table includes:

1. willingness of participants to discuss the problem in order to determine possible ways to solve it.

2. presence of a certain position, theoretical knowledge and practical experience.

Thus, the integral components of the round table:

1. unresolved issue;

2. equal participation of representatives of all interested parties;

3. development of solutions acceptable to all participants on the issue under discussion.

When holding a round table, in order to achieve a positive result and create a business atmosphere, it is necessary:

Provide an optimal number of participants (if the circle of specialists is large, not one leader is needed, but two.
Ensure the operation of technical means for audio and video recording.
Establish a schedule for speeches.
Ensure the appropriate design of the audience (it is desirable that the round table is truly round and communications are carried out “face to face”, which promotes group communication and maximum involvement in the discussion.)

Methodology for organizing and conducting a round table

There are usually three stages in organizing and holding a round table: preparatory, discussion and final (post-discussion).

I Preparatory stage includes:

· preparing a scenario (holding a round table according to a pre-planned scenario allows you to avoid spontaneity and chaos in the work of the round table).

The scenario assumes:

Definition of the conceptual apparatus (thesaurus);

List of discussion questions (up to 15 formulations);

Development of “homemade” answers, sometimes contradictory and extraordinary, using a representative sample of information;

Closing speech by the moderator;

· equipping the premises with standard equipment (audio-video equipment), as well as multimedia tools in order to maintain a business and creative atmosphere;

· counseling participants (allows most participants to develop certain beliefs that they will defend in the future);

II Discussion stage comprises:

2. General rules of communication include recommendations:

· - avoid common phrases;

· - focus on the goal (task);

· - know how to listen;

· - be active in the conversation;

· - be brief;

· - provide constructive criticism;

· - do not make offensive remarks towards your interlocutor.

· The presenter must act in a directive manner, strictly limiting the time of the round table participants.

3. conducting an “information attack”: participants speak out in a certain order, using convincing facts that illustrate the current state of the problem.

5. answers to discussion questions;

III The final (post-discussion) stage includes:

· summing up the final results by the presenter;

· establishing the overall results of the event.

Round table on the topic “Effective forms of working with families”

Target: consideration of the system of interaction between “family and school” from the perspective of psychological and pedagogical support for students and their parents.
Tasks:
get acquainted with the classification of forms and methods of working with the student’s family;
consider and discuss the problems of the identified issue; analyze the current state of the process of cooperation between family and school;
outline ways to build effective work between the school’s teaching staff and the contingent of student parents;
use the acquired theoretical knowledge in practice.

Category of participants: educational psychologists at city schools.
Form:"round table".
Operating time: 55 minutes.
Working methods:
- method of working in groups;
- project method;
- group discussion method.
Work principles:
- principle of activity;
- the principle of partnership communication;
- the principle of concentration of presence;
- feedback principle.
Material used:
- blank sheets of Whatman paper;
- markers or felt-tip pens;
- multimedia projector, interactive whiteboard, presentation.

Event structure:
1. Organizational moment (welcome ritual, emotional mood for work);
2. Theoretical part (introduction to the thematic part of the issue, familiarization of participants with new information);
3. Practical part – round table work (using teamwork techniques: “Interview”; “Exchange of opinions”; work in small groups);
4. Summing up, reflection.
5. Farewell ritual.

Progress.
I. Greetings and emotional mood of the participants for the upcoming work.
Exercise "Associations".
Working time: 6 minutes.
The presenter names three concepts in succession: “child”, “school”, “family”. The first participant’s task is to name his own association to the proposed word. Further in the circle, the next participant names the association to the previous word (for example: “child” - “baby” - “stroller” - “sleep”, etc.).

II. Theoretical part.
Working time: 12 minutes.

That child teacher is bad
who doesn't remember his childhood.
Ebner-Eschenbach.

Undoubtedly, all the concepts that were uttered: “child”, “school”, “family” are directly related to our conversation today. All of them are closely related to the process of education. The effectiveness of the educational process depends on how closely the school and family interact. The family is considered as the main customer and ally in the upbringing of children, and the combined efforts of parents and teachers create favorable conditions for the development of the child. The family can be compared to a launching pad that determines a person’s life path. Every adult, and first of all a parent, is responsible for ensuring that the child learns to overcome the problems that he encounters along the way.
Today, a well-thought-out and clearly organized system of cooperation is of great importance in working with students’ parents. Psychological and pedagogical support for parents of students can be organized through both individual and group forms of work.
Individual forms of work with parents include the following: individual consultations, conversations, questionnaires, express diagnostics, correspondence with parents, analysis of children's work, home visits.
Group interactions include such forms of interaction as parent meetings, conferences, round tables, question and answer evenings, parent universities, parent clubs, pedagogical discussions (disputes), role-playing games, parent trainings. The most common form of group work with parents is the parent meeting.
Individual forms of working with families.
Family visits are an effective form of individual work between a teacher and parents. When visiting a family, one gets to know the student’s living conditions. The teacher talks with parents about his character, interests, attitude towards parents, etc.
Correspondence with parents is a written form of informing parents about the progress of their children. It is permissible to notify parents about upcoming joint activities at school and provide recommendations on raising children.
Individual thematic consultations are carried out on the questions of the parents themselves if they are faced with a problem in raising a child that they cannot solve on their own. Consulting with parents is beneficial both for them and for the teacher. Parents receive a real idea of school affairs and the child’s behavior, while the teacher receives the information he needs for a deeper understanding of the student’s problems. Each consultation involves not only a discussion of the problem, but also practical recommendations for solving it. Not every teacher can conduct such a consultation, so it is always appropriate to involve competent specialists (psychologist, social educator) in finding a solution in a difficult situation.
Group forms of work with families.
Parent meetings are a form of analysis and comprehension, based on data from pedagogical science, of the experience of education. Parent meetings can be:
- organizational;
- current or thematic;
- final;
- school-wide and classroom.
The topic of parent meetings is determined by the class teacher based on a study of the goals and objectives of the school’s work with parents and based on the requests of class parents.
Parent universities are a fairly interesting and productive form of working with parents. The purpose of parent universities at school is the psychological and pedagogical education of parents. Education of parents is aimed at equipping them with the basics of pedagogical and psychological culture and familiarizing them with current issues of education. The most effective are parent universities, classes in which are conducted in parallel classes. This makes it possible to invite the most interested audience to a university lesson, which is united by a common problem and the same age characteristics. The specialists who conduct the meeting are better able to navigate parents’ questions and can prepare for them in advance.
The forms of classes at the parent university can be very diverse: conferences, question and answer hours on a current topic, lectures, workshops, parent rings.
The conference is a form of pedagogical education that provides for the expansion, deepening and consolidation of knowledge about raising children.
Conferences can be: scientific and practical, theoretical, reading, experience exchange, conferences of mothers and fathers. Conferences are held once a year, they require careful preparation and involve the active participation of parents. They usually include exhibitions of students' work, books for parents, and amateur art concerts. The topics of the conferences should be specific, for example: “Game in a child’s life”, “Moral education of adolescents in the family”, etc. The conference usually opens with an introductory speech by the school principal (if it is a school-wide conference) or the class teacher (if it is a classroom conference). Parents give brief, pre-prepared reports about their experience of family education. There may be three or four such messages. Then everyone is given the floor. The presenter of the conference sums up the results.
A lecture is a form of psychological and pedagogical education that reveals the essence of a particular educational problem. When preparing a lecture, you should take into account its structure, logic, you can draw up a plan indicating the main ideas, thoughts, facts and figures. One of the necessary conditions for lectures is reliance on the experience of family education. The method of communication during the lecture is casual conversation, intimate conversation, dialogue between interested like-minded people.
The topics of the lectures should be varied, interesting and relevant for parents, for example: “Age characteristics of younger adolescents”, “Schoolchildren’s daily routine”, “What is self-education?”, “Individual approach and taking into account the age characteristics of adolescents in family education”, “Sex education children in the family”, etc.
A workshop is a form of developing parents’ pedagogical skills in raising children, effectively solving emerging pedagogical situations, and a kind of training in the pedagogical thinking of parent-educators. During the pedagogical workshop, the teacher offers to find a way out of any conflict situation that may arise in the relationship between parents and children, parents and school, to explain his position in this or that supposed or actually arisen situation.
Pedagogical discussion (dispute) is one of the most interesting forms of improving pedagogical culture. A distinctive feature of the debate is that it allows everyone present to be involved in the discussion of the problems posed, and contributes to the development of the ability to comprehensively analyze facts and phenomena, relying on acquired skills and accumulated experience. The success of a debate largely depends on its preparation. In about a month, participants should become familiar with the topic of the future debate, the main issues, and literature. The most important part of a dispute is conducting the dispute. Much is determined here by the behavior of the presenter (it can be a teacher or one of the parents). It is necessary to establish rules in advance, listen to all speeches, propose, argue your position, and at the end of the debate sum up the results and draw conclusions. The main principle of the dispute is respect for the position and opinion of any participant. The topic of the debate can be any controversial issue of family and school education, for example: “Private school - pros and cons”, “Choosing a profession - whose business is it?”
Role-playing games are a form of collective creative activity to study the level of development of the participants’ pedagogical skills. Approximate topics for role-playing games with parents may be the following: “Parents and children”, “The child has come from school”, etc. The methodology for role-playing games involves determining the topic, the composition of the participants, the distribution of roles between them, and a preliminary discussion of possible positions and behavior options for the participants in the game. At the same time, it is important to play out several options (positive and negative) for the behavior of the game participants and, through joint discussion, choose the optimal course of action for the given situation.
Another form of cooperation with parents is training.
Parent training is an active form of work with those parents who are aware of problematic situations in the family, want to change their interaction with their own child, make him more open and trusting, and understand the need to acquire new knowledge and skills in raising their own child. Trainings as a form of correction of relationships between children and parents are the responsibility of a school psychologist. The class teacher talks with students and their parents and invites them to take part in the training. Participation of children and parents in joint training is possible only on a voluntary basis. Training sessions for children and their parents allow them to build relationships in a new way, promote understanding of the interests and needs of children and the requirements of parents.
Parental rings are prepared in the form of answers to the most pressing questions of pedagogical and psychological science. The parents choose the questions themselves. Parents receive a list of problematic issues for participation in the ring at the first parent meeting. During the ring, two or more families are debating on the same issue. They may have different positions, different opinions. The rest of the audience does not enter into controversy, but only supports the opinion of the families with applause. Young teachers working at the school can act as experts in the parent rings. The last word during the ring rests with the specialists who must be invited to participate in the meeting, or with the class leader, who can give compelling arguments from the life of the class team in defense of a certain position. Themes of parent rings can be very diverse:
“Bad habits: heredity or social influence?”
“What do you do if your child has discipline problems?
“What if dad is not interested in raising his own child?”
“Pros and cons of school uniforms.”
“Difficulties of a school lesson. What are they?”
To summarize what has been said, it should be noted that only in the process of interaction between teachers and parents can the problem of developing a child’s personality be successfully solved, but when using any educational technology, it is necessary to remember the commandment: “First of all, do no harm.”

III. The practical part is the work of the “round table”.
Exercise "Interview".
Working time: 5 minutes.
Participants are asked to think for one minute and answer the question: “What forms of work with families do you prefer in your professional activities?” The opinion of each person present is heard. At the end of the exercise, a conclusion is drawn about the frequency of using certain forms and methods of interaction with students’ parents.
Exercise “Exchange of Opinions”.
Working time: 7 minutes.
The participants’ task is to spend two minutes on small pieces of paper to try to formulate the topics of current (problematic) issues and topics used in working with students’ parents. After this, those present share their opinions. At the end of the discussion, a list of the most “popular and topical” topics is recorded on the board (flip chart).
Exercise “Three Visions”.
Working time: 15 minutes.
All participants are divided into three groups and within five minutes they create a joint project to see one stated problem from three different angles.
The topic of discussion is effective forms of working with families from the perspective of:
- close cooperation between the psychologist and the class teacher;
- close cooperation between a psychologist and a social teacher;
- close cooperation between the psychologist and the administrative corps.
After time, representatives of each group self-present their own projects. At the end of the work, a conclusion is drawn about the acceptable forms of work of a teacher-psychologist with the child-parent population and about the “sinking” directions in the activities of the psychological service.

V. Farewell ritual.
Operating time: 2 minutes.
The presenter thanks everyone present for their active and creative participation.

Bibliography:
1. Belchikov Ya.M., Birshtein M.M. Business games. Riga, 1989.
2. Vygotsky L.S., Luria A.R. Studies on the history of behavior. M., 1993.
3. Derekleeva N.I. Parent meetings. M., 2005.
4. Helping parents in raising children / Transl. from English; Ed. V.Ya. Pilipovsky. M., 1991.
5. Rogov E.I. Handbook for a practical psychologist in education. M., 1995.

A typical conference is when a group of people discuss something in an auditorium with speakers and a projector that broadcasts the next presentation on the wall. However, today such a scheme alone is not enough. Among the various formats for such discussions, special attention should be paid to the round table format.

What's the key difference? Round tables are a meeting of people specifically interested in discussing a particular topic. As a rule, they are all from the same professional field or with knowledge of the matter can answer the same questions. This format of events turns out to be not only many times more useful for the participants themselves, but also commercially more successful for sponsors.

Yes, round tables are not something revolutionary, but even if you are organizing them for the hundredth time, it will be useful to learn four key principles that will make your event even more successful.

Focus on a narrow topic

In any professional environment there are complex things that you want to understand more clearly for yourself. And the more accurately you define them for the round table, the better. It is most interesting to organize such meetings for people of specific professions or industries. The knowledge that participants in such an event will receive from people like them is difficult to overestimate.

A plan for all occasions

Although the topic should be as precise as possible, successful roundtables require an extensive list of subtopics to discuss. This is especially important for participants who, even by nature, are always slow to warm up for a big discourse. In order not to frantically improvise during the rest of the time, when the main issues have already been raised and discussed, it is worth taking the time to do a little research in advance on what else could be an interesting topic for conversation between these specific specialists.

LED screens for rent from RUB 2,500/m2! Available in warehouse in Moscow

Strong moderator

The key player in a round table is always the moderator or presenter. He must be accurate, confident and knowledgeable about the topic being discussed. Sometimes a speaker can become such a moderator. However, you should be careful here so that such a person does not end up pulling the whole blanket over himself during the event, which is typical for speakers. The responsibilities of the round table leader include other things. Firstly, he must competently move the discussion from one direction to another and avoid templates, secondly, involve the least active participants in the conversation and, finally, monitor the emotional atmosphere of the round table.

All about car tuning

Technology for preparing and holding a round table. Organization and holding of round tables. Working with information

Focus on a narrow topic

A plan for all occasions

Strong moderator