Primorsky Agricultural Academy. Primorsky State United Museum named after V. K. Arsenyev

Assessment of the negative impact exerted on the territory of the reserve by nature users:
1. Mining and processing works. Looking at the root of the issue about the contradictions of environmental activities and environmental management on the territory of the Primorsky reserve, the first number in the list of the main sources of anthropogenic pressure on its territory is the activity of the mining and processing plant (GOK) at the deposit named after. M. Lomonosov. It should be recognized that the territory of the reserve, and especially its internal parts, practically does not experience any direct negative impact from the mining and processing plant, which is located outside the boundaries of the specially protected area. The exception is physical (dust) and chemical pollution of the upper reaches of the river. Zolotitsa, which inevitably affects its waters downstream. More significant appearance The impact of the mining and processing plant on the adjacent territories is to increase their accessibility for people, and as a result, increase their recreational attractiveness. Today, about three thousand people, including many hunters and fishermen, provide rotational work at the mining and processing plant. An additional influx of recreationists ensures the functioning of year-round highway, connecting Arkhangelsk and the rotational camp. The presence of such a road was a natural reason for loggers to come to the area. It is important to remember that in the near future, another powerful source of anthropogenic pressure will appear on the border of the reserve - a mining and processing plant for the development of the deposit named after. V. Grib. In the absence of a field development project, it is difficult to assess the degree of impact on the natural complexes of the reserve. However, it should be taken into account that it is closer than from the deposit named after. Lomonosov, the distance to the boundaries of the reserve and the karst topography, which causes an unstable hydrological regime. The combined influence of two mining and processing plants will exceed the simple addition of two quantities.
2. Highway "p. Svetly – deposit named after. V. Grib" is being built on the territory of the reserve; its operation in the future involves the use of heavy vehicles.
The impact of the road on the natural complexes of the reserve, as well as the impact of the mining and processing plant, is divided into direct and indirect. The construction of the road and its operation have an impact on the forest ecosystem as
Direct physical and environmental impacts through geomorphological and hydrological regimes, and indirect impacts at the landscape level through impacts on the conservation of natural habitats for native species. Of particular concern is the passage of the road through the territory of the river basin. Padun, where the most valuable and vulnerable plant communities are concentrated, confined to the outcrops of carbonate rocks. The functioning of the road may cause the uncontrolled collection of the Red Book Maryina root, which is rare for the region, but common in the Padun area, and is known to have medicinal value. The start of operation of the road will likely mean the start of thinning in this valuable area.
3. Forest cutting, like road construction, is the most visually noticeable impact on the natural complexes of the reserve. In the forests of the reserve, the only fellings permitted and carried out by loggers are forest maintenance fellings (selective fellings) and sanitary fellings.
Currently, the entire territory of the reserve belongs to protective forests consisting of 4 categories: 1) forests located in water protection zones; 2) spawning protection strips of forests 3) restricted strips of forests located along water bodies; 4) forests located in... forest-tundra zones.
Classifying the forests of the regional reserve into the category of protective forests “forests located in specially protected natural areas” has no legal basis. In the powers of the bodies state power subjects Russian Federation in the field of forest relations does not include the classification of forests as protective. Therefore, the organization of a regional reserve in itself is not a basis for giving the territory the status of a protective forest category.
The legal regime of the listed categories of protective forests allows for selective logging. Currently, logging parameters have not been established, but the draft rules for timber harvesting and the use of protective forests propose limiting the logging intensity to 30%.
Particularly protected areas of forest within the boundaries of the Primorsky reserve are not reflected in forest management materials due to its age. However, this does not exempt forestry authorities and forest users from taking into account the legal regime of OZU. The legal regime of specially protected forest areas makes it possible to close part of the reserve from logging and limit other types of forest use.
Domestic foresters, including P.A. Alekseev, S.A. Bogoslovsky, M.E. Tkachenko and others, the negative impact of selective logging on spruce stands of the north has been repeatedly noted. Research by S.V. Alekseev and A.A. Molchanov show that selective felling in green spruce forests over 160 years old in the vast majority of cases leads to the complete destruction of the forest stand. Old-growth spruce forests cannot withstand selective cutting even at moderate intensity and begin to decay immediately after cutting.
Research by Alekseev and Molchanov was carried out in mid-taiga spruce forests. Contrary to expectations, no decay is observed in the forests of the Primorsky Nature Reserve. But the silvicultural effect of “rejuvenation” of forest stands is also not observed. Without additional measures: mineralization before the seed year or overseeding or planting (partial forest crops), it is not possible to stimulate the replacement of old-growth trees.
The advance of loggers deeper into the territory of the reserve is directly related to the infrastructure that appeared here to support the operation of the mining and processing plant. Therefore, logging on the territory of the reserve began with its southern border with Izhemsky district forestry. Already in 2010, logging roads may come close to one of the most untouched parts of the reserve - the river basin. Kui.
The project for the division of the Arkhangelsk forestry proposes to transfer part of the forests to operational ones. If the project is approved, the restrictions on the maximum size of cutting areas and the method of felling established for tundra forests will be lifted. Interest in timber harvesting in the forests of the reserve will increase significantly.
4. Geological exploration work includes verification drilling, which is carried out in small areas measuring 0.12 hectares. Such geological exploration works cover almost the entire territory of the reserve. In an area that is promising for subsoil use, drilling is being carried out at several (10 to 30) small sites measuring 0.12 hectares. The sites are located in a cluster method, with individual “branches” of the bush, 2-3 sites each, located at a short distance (1-2 km) from each other. Drilling of sites in a separate research area takes place in a short period of time (1-3 weeks), after which the used area is subject to reclamation and restoration. In temporary terms, such an impact on natural complexes is insignificant. However, traces of it are visible for a long time due to violations associated with the cleaning of the used area. As a rule, in areas left behind by geological exploration work, a certain amount of household and technical waste remains: containers for fuel and lubricants, used pipes and crowns, fuel spills, household waste from field camps (plastic, glass). Organizers of geological exploration work are required to clean up such waste, and if this requirement is fulfilled properly, verification drilling itself would have virtually no significant negative impact on the nature of the reserve.
5. The movement of tracked vehicles is an impact mainly associated with the possibility of conducting geological exploration work. Licensed areas leased for geological surveys are scattered throughout the entire area of the reserve. Tracked tractors and all-terrain vehicles are used to deliver reconnaissance crews and equipment to sites. In addition, tracked all-terrain vehicles are used by hunters and fishermen who work at the mining and processing plant. Within the boundaries of the reserve there is a ban on travel on tracked vehicles outside of technological roads during the snow-free period. At the same time, as such, there are no designated “technological roads” for the passage of tracked vehicles: the required “road” appears where the all-terrain vehicle passes. A comparison of aerial photographs from 2005 and satellite photographs from 2009 suggests that the density of tracked vehicle routes in the reserve is increasing.
Despite all the unsightliness of the disturbed moss cover in swamps and dented corridors through forests, the harmful effects of passages are limited in volumetric and spatial terms. In general, the territory remains undisturbed.
6. An increase in the likelihood of forest fires is a serious threat to the natural complexes of the reserve. The cause of a forest fire is usually careless handling of fire. An increase in logging volumes within the reserve, the intensity of geological exploration work and an increase in the number of “spontaneous” recreationists increase the likelihood of forest fires occurring in the reserve territory.
7. The negative anthropogenic impact on the fauna of the reserve is mainly local in nature and is caused by geological exploration work, logging and the activities of the mining and processing plant. The listed activities so far have only a local direct impact on the fauna, but their indirect impact is already widespread.
The action of many factors does not directly lead to the death of the land animals living here, but forces them to leave the territory adjacent to the production sites, or they become objects of increased persecution by an increased contingent of hunters and poachers. The reaction of different animals to these factors manifests itself differently and depends on the type of animal and the protective properties of the area, as well as on the scale and intensity of exploitation of the territory.
Forms of negative anthropogenic impact include:
Violation of protective, nesting and feeding stations of animals in areas of permanent and temporary allotment;
Damage was caused to the inhabitants of the soil and vegetation cover on roads and sites for drilling rigs, temporary timber warehouses and other objects. An examination of former drilling sites showed that in some areas, disturbed land was reclaimed and a layer of plant soil was applied; in other disturbed areas, the soil and vegetation cover is restored naturally. However, in conditions of poor soils and cold climates, this process usually takes a long time, so such areas become unsuitable for the animals that previously lived here.
Fragmentation of animal habitats and changes in the spatial structure of populations.
Research in the European North has established that for indigenous large representatives of the taiga fauna, the limit for deforestation of indigenous forests is 75-80%; exceeding this limit causes a sharp and irreversible reduction in numbers and other negative changes in animal populations. For small animals, even local areal or linear disturbances of habitat areas are limiting.
An increase in the disturbance factor from noise, light, and vibration effects of machines, mechanisms, and all-terrain vehicles.
The disturbance factor from light exposure and noise from operating installations and mechanisms have the greatest impact on the fauna in the initial period. Later, animals get used to this factor, which becomes background, or develop a reaction to avoid the disturbing area.
Flooding or drying out of lands, their pollution due to disruption of the hydraulic regime of watercourses
In the recent past, this factor was everywhere of significant importance, since neither geologists, nor loggers, nor miners envisaged the construction of the required number of bridges over streams and rivers, settling tanks, drainage ditches, decks and other culverts on low terrain. Currently, more effective environmental control has partially reduced the negative impact of this factor on animal habitats.
Disruption of migration routes
For some species of animals, the territory of the reserve is a temporary residence during the period of their migrations (regular, sporadic, migrations, etc.). Of the large animals, moose make regular seasonal migrations. In winter, these animals cross this territory in an easterly direction, and in the spring - in the opposite direction. These migrations were especially noticeable in the recent past (about 15 -20 years ago). Currently, migrations have become less noticeable. According to survey information, in last years moose make transitions to wintering areas, bypassing logging sites and the territory of the mining and processing plant from the north.
The flight paths of birds during their seasonal migrations lie over the territory of the reserve. There is information that these birds changed their flight route over the territory of the mining and processing plant due to the towering artificial mountain of waste dumps.
Competition between introduced and native species
A consequence of the negative result of the introduction of the American mink is the threat of extinction of the native European mink, which is still found in the reserve.
Increased recreational load on the land, including pressure from hunting and poaching, due to improved accessibility of the territory
The impact of hunting on fur-bearing animals has decreased in recent years due to the low price of pelts. At the same time, the pressure of sport hunting and poaching has increased due to the increased technical equipment of hunters and the availability of land. Hunting for upland and waterfowl, as well as elk and bear, is especially intense. TO negative consequences hunting must be attributed to the fact that the last specimen of wild reindeer was shot in February 2000 in the area of Lake Tovskoe. There is no positive information about the habitat here of wild domestic deer, which were previously found regularly in this area.
The most common objects of mass hunting at present are hazel grouse, black grouse and wood grouse. Excessive hunting is superimposed on the population depression that has continued over the past 3 years, which delays the emergence of populations from depression.
Accidental death of animals
Threat to animals, incl. rare species are carried by fixed fishing gear, as well as hunters' traps, since they catch such rare species as European mink, osprey, white-tailed eagle, and golden eagle. In recent years, the effect of this factor has been expanding due to the allocation of valuable habitats on water bodies for recreational areas.

692335, Primorsky Krai, Arsenyev, pl. Lenina, 6
Branch of the Pacific State Economic University in Arsenyev
692337, Primorsky Krai, Arsenyev, Zhukovsky, 9
Branch of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Far Eastern Federal University" in Arsenyev
692330, Primorsky Krai, Arsenyev, st. Ostrovskogo, 20

Artem

State branch of Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service in Artem
692760, Primorsky Krai, Artem, st. Kooperativnaya, 6
Branch of the Far Eastern State University in Artem
692760, Primorsky Krai, Artem, pl. Lenina, 15

Big Stone

Branch of the Far Eastern Federal University in Bolshoy Kamen State
692806, Primorsky Krai, Bolshoi Kamen, st. Karla Marksa, 2

Vladivostok

Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
690990, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Gogolya, 41
state
690087, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Kotelnikova, 21
Vladivostok branch of the Russian Customs Academy
690034, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Strelkovaya, 16v
Vladivostok branch of the St. Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions private
690950, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Vsevolod Sibirtseva, 15
Vladivostok branch of the Modern Humanitarian Academy private
690048, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, ave. 100 years of Vladivostok, 40a
state
690950, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Peter the Great, 3a
Far Eastern State Technical Fisheries University
690950, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, GSP, st. Lugovaya, 52b
Far Eastern State Technical University (FEPI named after V.V. Kuibyshev)
690950, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Pushkinskaya, 10
private
690013, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Kaplunova, 7
Maritime State University named after Admiral G.I. Nevelsk State
690059, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Verkhneportovaya, 50a
private
690091, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Aleutskaya, 11
Pacific State Medical University
690950, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, ave. Ostryakova, 2
Pacific State Economic University
690091, Primorsky Territory, Vladivostok, Okeansky Avenue, 19
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Far Eastern Federal University"
690950, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Sukhanova, 8
Branch "Military Educational and Scientific Center of the Navy" Naval Academy named after Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union N.G. Kuznetsov" (Vladivostok)
690062, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Kamsky lane, no. 6
private
690001, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, st. Captain Shefner, 2

Dalnegorsk

Branch of the Far Eastern Federal University in Dalnegorsk is not specified
692446, Primorsky Krai, Dalnegorsk, ave. 50 years of October, 124

Dalnerechensk

Branch of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Far Eastern Federal University" in Dalnerechensk
692100, Primorsky Krai, Dalnerechensk, st. Lenina, 69a

Lesozavodsk

Branch of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Far Eastern Federal University" in Lesozavodsk
692042, Primorsky Krai, Lesozavodsk, st. Proletarskaya, 7

Nakhodka

Far Eastern Maritime School (branch) of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Dalrybvtuz" state
692924, Primorsky Territory, Nakhodka, Nakhodkinsky Ave. 86
private
692900, Primorsky Krai, Nakhodka, st. Dalnyaya, 14
692930, Primorsky Krai, Nakhodka, st. Sportivnaya, 6
Nakhodka branch of the Modern Humanitarian Academy private
692926, Primorsky Krai, Nakhodka, st. Koltsevaya, 58
Nakhodka branch of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Maritime State University named after Admiral G.I. Nevelskoy"
692900, Primorsky Krai, Nakhodka, st. Zavodskaya, 3
State branch of Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service in Nakhodka
692902, Primorsky Krai, Nakhodka, st. Ozernaya, 2
Branch of the Pacific State Economic University in Nakhodka, Primorsky Territory
692926, Primorsky Krai, Nakhodka, st. Shkolnaya, 6
Branch of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Far Eastern Federal University" in Nakhodka
692918, Primorsky Krai, Nakhodka, st. Postysheva, 51a

Partizansk

Branch of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Far Eastern Federal University" in Partizansk
692880, Primorsky Krai, Partizansk, st. Central, 34

Spassk-Dalniy

Branch of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Far Eastern Federal University" in Spassk-Dalniy
692210, Primorsky Krai, Spassk-Dalniy, st. Leninskaya, 47

Exhibition project “Eleanor Prey. Letters from Vladivostok", st. Svetlanskaya, 20

Primorsky State United Museum named after V. K. Arsenyev- the first local history museum in the Far East, the largest museum in the Primorsky Territory. The museum presents the history and nature of the Primorsky Territory, contains collections of materials about the activities of researchers of the region - M. I. Venyukov, N. M. Przhevalsky and others, materials on the history of the city, archeology and ethnography. The museum includes 3 branches in Vladivostok and 5 in other cities of Primorye.

The museum considers April 18 (30) of the year to be its founding date. On this day, the charter of the Society for the Study of the Amur Region (SIAK), the founder of the future museum, was approved. The OIAC Museum was built and opened to the public on October 12 (September 30) of the year. By decree of the Council of People's Commissars of February 17, 1925, the museum was removed from the property of the OIAC and became state-owned. The name of Vladimir Klavdievich Arsenyev was given to the museum on September 4, 1945.

The museum and its directorate are now located in the building of the former apartment building of Vasily Petrovich Babintsev, one of the partners of the largest commercial and industrial company in the Far East, “Trading House Churin and Kasyanov,” built in 1903-1906 according to the design of the architect Vladimir Antonovich Plansen. After the revolution, the building alternately housed: Yokohama Special Bank, a hairdresser, a kebab shop, the provincial financial department, and the Pacific Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (TINRO). In 1977, here from the building former museum OIAC moved to the Primorsky Regional Museum.

In 2015 it was named the most visited regional museum in Russia.

Museum address: 690090, Vladivostok, st. Svetlanskaya, 20.

Branches

In Vladivostok the museum has three branches:

House of the traveler Arsenyev

House of the traveler Arsenyev, st. Arsenyeva, 7b

The V. K. Arsenyev Memorial House-Museum is the only house preserved in Russia where Vladimir Klavdievich Arsenyev, an outstanding Russian and Soviet writer, scientist, traveler-researcher, a man of state thinking and duty, who made a significant contribution to the development of the Far East, lived and worked.

This house was built at the beginning of the 20th century and belonged to the well-known homeowner in Vladivostok, Andrei Fedorovich Zhikhov. The Arsenyev family moved into apartment number 4 on the second floor in June 1929.

Since 1945, the street on which the house is located bears the name of Arsenyev. In 1997, the building was transferred to the museum.

The arrangement of rooms in the apartment has been preserved as it was during Vladimir Klavdievich’s life: an office, a living room, a small bedroom and a nursery. In the office and living room, furniture and household items are arranged as they were during the traveler’s lifetime, and instead of a bedroom and a nursery there is an exhibition hall.

Address: st. Arsenyeva, 7b.

Official's house

Work office of A.V. Sukhanov, st. Sukhanova, 9

The Sukhanov Family Memorial House-Museum is the only museum in Russia in memory of a civil servant. It is also one of the few surviving wooden mansions of the 19th century in Vladivostok. In 1977, on the initiative of Vladivostok residents, a museum was opened here.

From 1896 to 1921, the family of the senior adviser to the Primorsky regional government, Alexander Vasilyevich Sukhanov, lived in this house, who dedicated his life to the improvement of Primorye and Vladivostok. Konstantin, one of the seven children of Alexander Vasilyevich and Anna Vasilyevna, became a famous revolutionary, the first “red” mayor of Vladivostok (chairman of the executive committee of the Vladivostok Council of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies).

Today, in seven halls used for exhibition space, you can see antique furniture and household items from the late 19th - early 20th centuries: for example, musical instruments that settlers brought here across the country, sewing machines, bath accessories and even chocolates from the G factory . P. Tkachenko".

Address: st. Sukhanova, 9.

43°07′02″ n. w. 131°53′44″ E. d. HGIOL